armor breastplate shows dents!


I was really looking forward to this particular Masters of the Universe Classics figure. While it's OK, it's really left me cold. This is Battle Armor He-Man.
The Battle Armor version was the only version of He-Man I had back in the day. I got him in a rare giftset with Battle Cat. That figure saw much playtime until his arm broke off at the shoulder, taking the piece that connects the arm to the body with it. (If you've ever taken an arm off a vintage MOTU figure, you'll know what I'm talking about.) However, a short time later, I came across one at a garage sale (the same one I got Zodac at) for 50 cents, and even though this BA He-Man had white-out on his feet for some reason (and still does to this day) it was easier than trying to find a new He-Man in the wilds of 1980s retail, which I can tell you wasn't an easy task.

Battle Armor He-Man, along with its counterpart, Battle Armor Skeletor, are legendary toys. If you were to meet anyone who has seen or played with MOTU toys, they remember these BA guys even if they don't remember anything else. The fact that you could cause make-believe 'damage' to your toys and repair it by turning the drum back was a fantastic action feature, possibly the best ever created.

This past summer, Mattel announced that BA He-Man would be making an appearance in the Classics line, news I greeted with much joy and mirth (can't you just feel it?) The figure went on sale last Friday, and I received it today. Well, it's left me cold, and a little disappointed. First off, the action feature is gone. Vanished. In its place are swappable chest pieces meant to represent the dents on the original toy. It's not so bad when written like that, but here's where it truly fails- you have to take the armor off in order to change the plates. I'm sure it was for aesthetic reasons, and these are $30 toys sold to adults, but c'mon, couldn't we have found a better way? Also, while we're on the subject of them being $30, couldn't this figure have included either a sword or shield? I know the original one had the sword, but considering all the reuse in the line and the fact that THESE COST $30, would it have been unreasonable to ask for those accessories? The ax is OK, but the cheapness of this is pretty shocking to me. I know the armor could count as an accessory, but since every other piece of this figure has been used at least three times now, I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for a sword or shield. But that just lets Mattel sell a Weapons Pack somewhere down the line. It's made a bit worse by the sword being expressly called out on this figure's bio on the back of the package.

As disappointed as I am with this figure, well, I must admit that these MOTUC figures are like pizza- even if they're bad, they're still good. BA He-Man will look great on display, and that's about the only consolation you'll have since you already spent $30 on him and UPS is going to deliver it soon. This guy will look great on Battle Cat, who goes on sale next month. Hopefully, with that addition, this figure is redeemed for me. As it is now, it's just 'meh.'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

hidden treasures

As I mentioned earlier, I'm in the process of moving. In this, I've found several Star Wars items I hadn't gotten around to opening. For instance, I found a pack of Pit Droids and Battle Droids on 2007 cards, and two more Biker Scouts, which brings my total numbers of Biker Scout action figures to 12. Which is great, since the Biker Scout is my favorite trooper from the saga. I also opened three Evolutions sets- Padme, Rebel Pilots II, and Sith Lords. I've left the Sith one boxed for damn near 18 months. I'm kind of disappointed it took so long, since I have a new favorite SW figure after opening it- Darth Nihilus . I also opened my Lucas Family set, which is a great boxed set of their background appearances in Revenge of the Sith. It's basically a set of background aliens and a Jedi Padawan and was a terrible seller when it was released, since it was overpriced. I got it for $10, and it's a steal for that. I still have yet to open a Death Star Briefing set ...
Read more

Commentary #1

I'm going to break from the norm here and talk about a problem collectors are having now. It's distribution of product, or lack thereof. Let me take, for example, the Star Wars line. Right now, I am currently lacking 8 figures and two special sets, them being the Sith Evolutions and Jedi Temple Assault sets. And I just heard today that six more figures have been spotted. I've never been this far behind on the Star Wars line, and it's not for lack of money, it's because the products simply aren't there. If I want the item bad enough, I usually set aside money for it. But this stuff I just can't find. I was having a conversation with someone from JediDefender, and I hope he doesn't mind, but I'm going to copy and paste a little snippet of what he wrote, since it sums up exactly what the problem is in better words than I could. ....I was referring to the fact that finding a figure or vehicle wasn't anywhere near as complicated back then as it seems ...
Read more

Dear makers of the upcoming Masters of the Universe movie

Image
Here is your competition, from the 2009 GI Joe live-action movie. As you can see, it is patently ridiculous. Folks at Warner Brothers, you know you can do better than Paramount, the entity producing GI Joe. Just because it's based on a cartoon from the 1980s doesn't mean it still has to look ridiculous in a different way. I beg you, Warner Brothers, to look at what made the original property so charming in the first place, and not "update" or leatherize it. Some people say it worked for the X-Men franchise, but the only thing that time has proven about that is that copying that idea is bringing down genre films as a whole. I know you are worried about profits, since it's expensive to make movies, but not everything has to appeal to teenagers. Yes, they have money, but people who actually played with He-Man toys in the 1980s have lots more money, and some of them even have kids. Please, think of the twenty- and thirtysomethings and their children instead of the low...
Read more